DISCRIMINATION AS SEX DISCRIMINATION UNDER EQUAL PROTECTION
Because the case was decided under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which comprehends both substantive due process and equal protection principles (as incorporated through the Fourteenth Amendment), this statement leaves unclear precisely how each of these doctrines bears on the presented issue. There are currently over anti-LGBTQ bills that have been introduced at the state level across the country. Ninety of these bills would prevent transgender youth from accessing age-appropriate gender affirming care, two of which have already become law. LGBTQ+ Rights Supreme Court Cases
Gay and lesbian rights in the United States have been significantly influenced by Supreme Court rulings, particularly regarding issues of marriage, privacy, and discrimination. Although the Constitution does not explicitly protect individuals based on sexual orientation, the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments have been interpreted to provide some. Julius L. Ratified as it was after the Civil War in , there is little doubt what the Equal Protection Clause was intended to do: stop states from discriminating against blacks. 
The U.S. Supreme Court Can Protect the LGBTQ+ Community, But
Thus, a state constitutional amendment violated the Equal Protection Clause when it precluded all legislative, executive, or judicial action at any level of state or local government designed to protect the status of persons based on their homosexual, lesbian, or bisexual orientation, conduct, practices, or relationships. Hurley v. Fourteenth Amendment , Section All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
Is Being Gay a Protected Class Under the Law?
In so holding, the Court recognized a general synergy between the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause, noting that just as evolving societal norms inform the liberty rights of same-sex couples, so too do new insights and societal understandings about homosexuality reveal unjustified inequality with respect to traditional concepts. Explore the current legal framework that provides protections based on sexual orientation, including its sources, scope, and recognized limitations. The legal landscape regarding whether being gay is a protected class has shifted, providing new security against discrimination. Sexual Orientation
The legal landscape regarding whether being gay is a protected class has shifted, providing new security against discrimination. A “protected class” is a group of people shielded by law from discriminatory treatment. This protection means certain personal characteristics, such as race or religion, cannot be used as a basis for negative actions in specific areas of life. For gay individuals. Gay and lesbian rights in the United States have been significantly influenced by Supreme Court rulings, particularly regarding issues of marriage, privacy, and discrimination. Although the Constitution does not explicitly protect individuals based on sexual orientation, the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments have been interpreted to provide some legal protections against discrimination. 
Gay and lesbian rights and the Supreme Court
The Equal Protection Clause holds that “no state shall make or enforce any laws [that] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Ratified in as part of the Reconstruction Amendments, the Equal Protection Clause was originally intended to protect Black people from state-sanctioned discrimination. .
Discrimination Laws with Emphasis on Sexual Orientation
ABSTRACT Despite four major Supreme Court opinions involving lesbian, gay, and bisexual (“LGB”) rights, how courts should treat sexual orientation under equal protection remains unknown. This ambiguity will persist until LGB advo-cates abandon the essentialist theoretical model of sexual orientation as a status derived from nature and instead promote a social constructionist framework that. . 
Interpretation
One of the greatest controversies regarding the Equal Protection Clause today is whether the Court should find that sexual orientation is a suspect classification. In its recent same-sex marriage opinion, Obergefell v. Hodges (), the Court suggested that discrimination against gays and lesbians can violate the Equal Protection Clause. .